A difficult area for our client companies and their employees has been deciding how to Care for the Elderly.  Deciding what to do with aging  mom or dad can be very hard as the adult children become the responsible caregiver. Blomqusit Hale EAP has a variety of tools and free programs to help our clients in these situations.

Promoting our services to our client companies and employees is very important. One of the tools we have been using is a company called Brainshark. They are an online video presentation company that allowed us to easily turn a PowerPoint into an online video.  The process of building the video was simple and allowed us to get detailed information out about our EAP Senior Care Program.

In fact, since using Brainshark we have increased our EAP Senior Care Program attendance by over 220%. More families are meeting with our Senior Care Specialist and learning about Care Centers, In Home options, VA Loans, Medicare and Medicad, Financial Resources, Taxes, Power of Attorney and a variety of other things that are important when it comes to senior care.

Here is a sample of our video that was produced… This video is currently embedded on the main home page at www.blomquisthale.com. (Just go to the Home Page and Click on the Senior Care Assistance Video).  We have also sent this video out to our client companies which they have easily and quickly  forwarded on to their employees.  Brainshark has helped us quickly and easily spread the word about our product and services. The best part is we have helped out hundreds of people in difficult situations. We have reduced levels of stress and despair and replaced it with hope, options and help for those in need. We get countless thank yous from those that participate in our senior care program expressing how it has drastically helped their family situations.

Click on Image Above to See Video

Sometimes the best help people need is just someone to talk with. Blomquist Hale EAP will continue using the technology and services  to get the messages out about our products.  If you need help or would like to to speak with a counselor today please call for assistance.

Blomquist Hale EAP

By Thomas Joiner, PhD

SALT LAKE CITY — Some people who struggle with mental illness are never diagnosed, others not until they are well into adulthood; but unlike those who face challenges with diabetes or even cancer, these people often feel isolated or want to hide because they fear they will be labeled.

KSL News recently talked to several Utahns who are facing their illnesses with courage and are determined to live productive lives.

With young children, their lives were turned upside down. But Donna Brodis stayed by her husband’s side.

“I had faith he would be strong enough to pull through it because I knew that he had a good character and this was an illness like any other physical illness,” Donna said. “The brain is an organ, and sometimes when your brain is sick. You don’t always realize it, and you struggle through it, and you push through it.”

After a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, medications and electroconvulsive therapy helped Walt conquer the severe depression and weight gain. He began looking for a creative outlet and returned to his high school love of painting.

Walt’s artwork is so unique, that he has now been invited to participate in an art show in New York City. The Artist Project is an exhibition of fine art from unrepresented international artists.

“Maybe people need to hear that a person like me, who’s functional and doing something worthwhile, had a period in his life where he was afraid of himself and needed help,” Walt said.

Joe Brodis

Just as Walt’s life began improving, his youngest son, Joe, began to have bipolar symptoms.

“It’s a very different picture for kids who have bipolar disorder. We recognized what his strengths were and that he could still have a successful life, but we had to do these other things, like he would if he had any other illness, and we tried to be honest with the other kids,” Donna said.

Zach Wittwer

“I didn’t want to feel the way I felt anymore. I knew that wasn’t who I was. I wasn’t that angry of a person, that sad of a person,” said Zach Wittwer.

Prior to his diagnosis of bipolar disorder, at age 13, Zach remembers not understanding what was going on in his mind. He has spent the last several years balancing doctors’ appointments and medications.

Now 21, Zach takes college courses online and has a job. He hopes to become a special education teacher.

“I think as soon as you’re comfortable, just tell people. Don’t be ashamed of the illness, because you wouldn’t be ashamed if you had diabetes,” he said.

Zach is the oldest of four children. His family was initially devastated but searched for help. His mother, Sherri Wittwer, is now the executive director of Utah’s National Alliance on Mental Illness.

“We have an amazing family — where they’re educated, they understand, and they really do support Zach,” she said. “But that’s not to say it hasn’t been a difficult journey, and it continues to be for Zach every day.”

Dr. Walt Brodis

Dr. Walt Brodis was 40 when, as a successful internal medicine specialist, he fell apart.

“I was suicidal for about five years, horribly suicidal for five years, pretty much couldn’t be left alone,” Walt said. “So my wife didn’t work. She had to be here with me.”

School is difficult, but medications are helping. Joe hopes someday to design video games.

“Especially for bipolar disorder, you can’t give up,” Joe said. “But you’ve got to keep pushing through.”

He is grateful for the acceptance he has from friends.

“It’s hard for them to understand, but for them to still be my friend, it was awesome,” Joe said. “Sometimes I get mad and they deal with that, my friends. They’re just there for me.”

These families share a great deal of love and acceptance. They still face challenges, but mental illness does not define them.

“As we came to understand about mental illness and the treatments that are available, we saw that there was hope as well,” Sherri Wittwer said.

Finding help for mental illness …

• National Alliance on Mental Illness in Utah
• Utah Department of Human Services
• The Children’s Center

A considerable number of Americans are trapped in a vicious cycle of unhealthy attempts to manage their high levels of stress, which limits their ability to make beneficial behavioral or lifestyle changes. 2010 Stress in America, a new study released by the American Psychological Association cautions that the impact of long-term (chronic) stress can leave serious physical and emotional consequences for individuals and their families.

A 2010 Harris Interactive survey reveals that many people, especially those who believe they are in fair or poor health, claim to lack the willpower and opportunity to make useful changes that would improve their lives.

Parents also appear to be unaware of the effect the stress they have to bear is having on their children. A growing number of young children are describing emotional and health consequences typically linked to stress.

Norman B. Anderson, PhD, American Psychological Association’s (APA’s) chief executive officer and executive vice president, said:

America is at a critical crossroads when it comes to stress and our health. Year after year nearly three-quarters of Americans say they experience stress at levels that exceed what they define as healthy, putting themselves at risk for developing chronic illnesses such as heart disease, diabetes and depression.

Stress is hurting our physical and emotional health and contributing to some of the leading causes of death in this country. People are also saying they have difficulty implementing the changes they know will decrease their stress and improve their health. Yet, our health care system is not adequately addressing this issue or providing the behavioral health treatments that can help Americans. All of us, including the medical community, need to take stress seriously since stress could easily become our next public health crisis.

The impact on children

Overweight or obese children were found to have significantly higher incidences of stress; most said their parents were always or often stressed four weeks prior to being surveyed. This link between overweight/obesity and stress also exists among adults.

31% of overweight/obese children worry a great deal or a lot, while 14% of children of normal body weight do the same. 36% of overweight/obese children worry about their looks, compared to 11% of normal-weight kids.

39% of overweight/obese children say their parents are stressed out often or always, compared to 30% of normal-weight kids.

The survey identified a clear link between overweight in children and physical/emotional health consequences linked to stress, and the unhealthy management of stress. When asked whether they had experienced any of the following during the previous twelve months, this is how they responded:

• Have you had trouble falling asleep?
  Overweight children 48%. Normal weight children 33%.
• Do you get headaches?
  Overweight children 43%. Normal weight children 28%.
• Have you been eating too much or too little?
  Overweight children 48%. Normal weight children 16%.
• Have you been feeling angry or getting into fights?
  Overweight children 22%. Normal weight children 13%.
• Do you eat to make yourself feel better when you are stressed or worried about something?
  Overweight children 27%. Normal weight children 14%.
• Do you take a nap to make yourself feel better when you are stressed or worried about something?
  Overweight children 26%. Normal weight children 15%.

The effect stress is having on families

When asked to rate their levels of stress from nothing (0) to maximum (10), 32% of parents rated theirs at 8 to 10, what the authors of the report describe as extreme levels of stress. The vast majority of parents say they are enduring levels of stress which go beyond their definition of healthy. The average stress score reported by all parents in the survey was 6.1. Those who described their stress levels as healthy scored an average of 3.9.

By Christine S. Moyer, amednews staff. Posted Oct. 25, 2010.

As an internist, Charles Cutler, MD, was trained primarily to detect and treat physical problems. But he sees many patients for mental health issues at his practice in Norristown, Pa.

Because psychiatrists in the area frequently do not have openings for new patients, Dr. Cutler often provides mental health treatment.

He is among a growing number of primary care physicians who say they are handling a greater load of mental health care. A report from the Center for American Progress, a public policy and advocacy organization, shows that more than a third of patients who receive treatment for mental health disorders rely solely on primary care physicians.

“A key part of primary care is an awareness of the need to provide mental health services to your patients. If you’re doing primary care and you’re not aware of that, you’re in the wrong field,” Dr. Cutler said.

Although treating psychiatric conditions in primary care is not new, the amount of cases physicians are seeing is increasing, said Thomas Wise, MD, medical director of behavioral health services at Inova Health System in Falls Church, Va.

One reason for the trend is that there are too few psychiatrists to meet the nation’s mental health needs, doctors say. In the past decade, the number of practicing psychiatrists has grown from 39,494 to 40,904 — an uptick of only 1,410, according to 2010 data from the American Medical Association’s Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the U.S. The figure does not include specialists in child and adolescent psychiatry.

Although the number of psychiatrists has increased, the supply is not keeping pace with the demand for such specialists, said Steven Schlozman, MD, an assistant professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School in Boston. Too few students pursue psychiatry, in part, because the specialty typically requires four additional years of training after medical school — more if doctors pursue child and adolescent psychiatry, he said.

In addition, psychiatrists often are disproportionately spread across the country, with a majority practicing in urban areas. And there is a stigma attached to psychiatry by some patients who may feel more comfortable seeing a primary care doctor for mental health issues.

Prevalence of mental illness

Nearly one in 10 Americans 18 and older is depressed, according to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study in the Oct. 1 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. One in four adults has a diagnosable mental disorder in any given year, according to the National Institute of Mental Health.

When a psychiatric issue is identified, primary care doctors have limited options for referring patients to specialists due to the shortage of mental health professionals, particularly child and adolescent psychiatrists, Dr. Schlozman said.

Additionally, many health insurers contract out psychiatric benefits to different companies. Unlike most referrals from physicians, this approach often requires patients to find an available psychiatrist by making calls from a list provided by their insurer.

“This makes it immensely more difficult for patients to get care,” Dr. Schlozman said.

Another problem is that some primary care physicians lack the training and appropriate amount of time to successfully treat mental problems, experts said. The result is that some mental disorders are going undiagnosed.

With mental illness affecting all ages and experienced by many with chronic conditions, the impact is great. “This is not something we can ignore,” said Lesley Russell, PhD, a visiting fellow at the Center for American Progress.

In October, the center issued a report on mental health care services in primary care. The report said more primary care doctors are treating mental health problems, but the quality of treatment is uneven, because many conditions are going unrecognized and untreated. Only a third of cases seen by primary care doctors received minimally adequate care, the report said.

Improving mental health care

To ensure that patients with mental health issues do not go untreated, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force in 2009 recommended that physicians screen adults for depression when there is a support system in place to ensure “accurate diagnosis, effective treatment and follow-up.”

Physician organizations, such as the American College of Preventive Medicine, also have issued depression guidelines for doctors to use. In 2009, the college recommended that primary care doctors screen all adult patients for depression.

In October, the American Psychiatric Assn. issued new clinical guidelines for patients with major depressive disorder, updating its 2000 guidelines. The guidance includes new evidence-based recommendations on antidepressants, depression-focused psychotherapies and strategies for treatment-resistant depression.

In the primary care setting, physicians should look for signs of mental health problems, such as trouble sleeping and eating, experts say. In children, doctors should look for atypical behavior that begins suddenly, such as irritability or a drop in grades with a good student, said Ulrick Vieux, DO, medical director of Children’s Community Mental Health Services at St. Luke’s and Roosevelt Hospitals in New York.

Daniel Yohanna, MD, vice chair of the Dept. of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience at the University of Chicago Medical Center, encourages physicians to attend mental health lectures at medical conferences. He also recommends that primary care doctors modify their practices so staff members can consult mental health specialists easily when they identify patients with psychiatric issues.

Russell, of the Center for American Progress, said some barriers to receiving mental health care will be reduced by the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act. The law, which took effect Jan. 1, prohibits group insurance plans from restricting access to mental health care by limiting benefits and requiring higher patient costs than for general medical or surgical benefits.

Dr. Yohanna said telemedicine, such as video conferencing, might help physicians connect with child psychiatrists to evaluate a patient. Despite the benefits of the health parity law, challenges will remain for primary care physicians, he said.

“It’s true that most of the people with psychiatric disorders are seen in primary care,” Dr. Yohanna said. “It’s up to [psychiatrists] to figure out ways to assist them, because we’re not going to put a psychiatrist in every county.”

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

“Mental Health Care Services in Primary Care: Tackling the Issues in the Context of Health Care Reform,” Center for American Progress, Oct. 4 (www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/10/pdf/mentalhealth.pdf)

“Current Depression Among Adults — United States, 2006 and 2008,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Oct. 1 (www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5938a2.htm)

“Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder,” American Psychiatric Assn., October (www.psych.org/guidelines/mdd2010)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Mental Health Work Group (www.cdc.gov/mentalhealth)

Colleagues, acquaintances, e-patients, media and others often ask me, “What’s the state of online therapy? Does it have a future?” My answer hasn’t changed significantly in the past decade, for good reason — very little has changed in the field.

For folks who may be unawares, I’ve been a part of the mental health landscape and online therapy since the early 1990s, and e-therapy specifically when it started to hit the scene hard in the late 1990s. In fact, I coined the term “e-therapy” to describe online psychotherapy — a specific modality of psychotherapy that utilizes many techniques and features of traditional face-to-face psychotherapy. In 1999, I joined an e-therapy startup — HelpHorizons.com — as the industry’s youngest COO and led that company to a successful acquisition years later.

There’s no dearth of professionals willing to give e-therapy a try. In fact, when we ran HelpHorizons in the early 2000s, we had over 1,000 professionals at one point who signed up for the service.

What we lacked were people who actually utilized or wanted to utilize the service. And that’s the key problem with online psychotherapy: It’s a great modality that few consumers actually want to use.

One way around this problem, from a business perspective, is to simply get health or employee insurance plans to sign up for an e-therapy service based upon offering this as an “added benefit” for employees or covered lives in the plan. The idea is simple — if X% of insured lives use online therapy over face-to-face therapy, it’ll save the insurance company some money (because typically e-therapy is a little less expensive than traditional psychotherapy — but not significantly so when practiced via live chat or video conferencing services like Skype).

The problem comes when the rubber meets the road. If you look at utilization rates of people who actually use e-therapy services, they’re frightening. Nobody uses it. Nobody cares for it. Okay, that’s an exaggeration, because obviously e-therapy is right for some small percentage of people who need or want psychotherapy services. But the important thing is that it’s neither right nor used by the vast majority of people who have access to it. Once insurance companies review the utilization rates, they cancel the contract. If nobody is using the service, what’s the point of offering it?

Over the years, I’ve talked with dozens of people who’ve tried out e-therapy. I always ask them the same question, “Why did you stop?” Two factors have emerged — cost and face-to-face is more authentic a therapy experience.

People don’t like to pay for services online, unless it is helping them in a game (think Farmville, Cityville or Second Life), or to buy a subscription to an established information source. Even that bastion of pay-for-service model — porn — has given way to free porn. Nobody pays for porn any more, which has devastated the porn industry (or so I hear!). Nobody pays for advice either (since there are hundreds of places you can get free advice online, including our own Ask the Therapist service, and Psych Central Answers).

So all that leaves is paying for a real therapy interaction.

Well, that’s cool — there are some people willing to do that. And many therapists willing to provide that. But when you look at things like cost, you find out that you can see a real therapist face-to-face for either less (because your insurance covers the majority of the cost of care) or just a little more (if you choose to pay out of your own pocket). And trust me, when it comes time for mental health treatment, there is something definitely reassuring in talking to another human being in the same room with you.

Which is the other reason that people stopped with e-therapy service. They used it for a short-term problem, and didn’t need it any longer. Or it showed them that what they really needed was to see a real therapist, face-to-face. The feedback I’ve gotten is that while online therapy can be rewarding and reassuring, it doesn’t compare with the authenticity (at this point, anyway) of a face-to-face therapy interaction.

Additionally, many of the benefits of e-therapy quickly lose their status when you move e-therapy from asynchronous communications (two people are logged on at different times) — secure email, for instance — to synchronous communications (two people must be logged on at the same time). Once you require a therapist to spend the same amount of time talking to you online (whether it’s through Skype, chat room, or text messaging), the therapist is going to charge similar amounts of money as they do for face-to-face sessions. So one of the primary benefits of online therapy in the past — reduced cost, whenever-I-want convenience — flies out the door.

“If I have to schedule my online session just as I schedule a face-to-face session with a real-life therapist, I might as well see the real-life therapist,” is what I often hear. Which is what the vast majority of folks do when confronted with the actual costs and inconvenience of real-time, synchronous online therapy. Add to that that most insurance companies still do not cover the cost of online sessions, then it’s a no brainer. Face-to-face, traditional psychotherapy is often less expensive and more emotionally fulfilling than a comparable online therapy session.

Sometimes it’s hard for a businessperson who doesn’t have a deep background in mental health reimbursement to see the realities and complexities of behavioral healthcare in the U.S. Some appear to have the naive belief they can change a marketplace overnight that’s been formed through decades’ worth of existing treatment, mental health policy and administration, politics, budgets and reimbursement schedules. That a TV commercial and a mention in the The New York Times is all it takes.

Mental health professionals who’ve spent any time actually working and getting reimbursed within the current system know how difficult and convoluted the system really is. Billionaire and AOL founder Steve Case thought it would just take some technology and gumption to change healthcare in the U.S. when he launched Revolution Health in 2004. A few years later, disillusioned, he sold the remnants of his company to Everyday Health.

Healthcare in the U.S. isn’t going to change quickly — or overnight. The ObamaCare bill and Mental Health Parity Act don’t really do much to change the playing field when it comes to online therapy. And there still has been little demand for online therapy from consumers, because they don’t see a cost-benefit ratio that makes sense to them. Media hype notwithstanding, this particular application of telehealth makes the most sense for people who live in rural areas and can’t get to see a therapist locally. That’s a good market, but a small one.

I have a lot of hope for the future of e-therapy making small inroads into the mental health treatment space over time. But this part of telehealth is the least interesting right now from a business perspective because the consumer demand remains extremely limited.

By Milton D. Carrero, OF THE MORNING CALL

11:19 p.m. EST, January 7, 2011

Capital Blue Cross members who struggled over the holidays to get mental health coverage now have a reason to celebrate.

After reviewing 2008 federal rules, Capital Blue Cross has reinstated its mental health care benefits for individual plans, a move that enables 9,000 members to continue with their doctor’s appointments, therapy and medications.

The insurance company will maintain its current behavioral coverage for the same price, according to Cindy Hatcher, senior director of individual products at Capital Blue Cross.

From my perspective, we are really glad that we can help our members and that we can come to this resolution,” Hatcher said Friday.

The company caused commotion among members last month when it announced it would discontinue behavioral coverage this year due to financial concerns. The decision forced thousands to scramble during the holiday season to find a new provider, which proved nearly impossible.

James Jordan, executive director of the Pennsylvania National Alliance on Mental Illness, was concerned that the decision could cause people who would normally lead productive lives to go into crisis. He requested an emergency meeting with Capital Blue Cross.

After the meeting, the company decided to extend its existing coverage until the end of February. In the meantime, the insurer promised to review whether it was viable to keep mental health coverage after the extension.

On Friday, Capital Blue Cross announced its decision to reinstate its current mental health coverage.

The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, signed in 2008, requires insurers to provide the same level of benefits for mental illness or substance abuse as for other physical disorders and diseases.

Hatcher said the company was originally under the impression it would need to expand its mental health care to meet the demands of the law. The additional coverage would have forced Capital Blue Cross to increase premiums by 10 percent on top of the 9.9 percent hike that was already expected for this year.

Afraid that members would not be able to afford the coverage, the company chose to eliminate mental health care from its individual plans.

“We believed that we had to provide mental health parity,” Hatcher said. “As we looked at the multiple interpretations of the law, we became comfortable with an interpretation that said that mental parity did not apply for individual plans.”

Members need not wait to receive a new health care identification card. The current card will continue to be valid.

Those affected were quick to show their relief, even though the official notifications have not yet arrived.

“I’m very grateful that Capital Blue Cross responded reasonably to our concerns,” said a member who lives in Northampton County and suffers from reactive depression. “I don’t feel so stigmatized by the insurance industry any more. I feel that Blue Cross’ motto of ‘We do more because we care more’ is a little bit more true now.”

mcarrero@mcall.com

Crucially, researchers have also found that this activity needs to be taken in people’s leisure time if they are to feel the benefits. The study showed that people who exert themselves at work, by doing lots of walking or lifting, are no less likely to be depressed than people with sedentary jobs.

Researchers from the Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London teamed up with academics from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health and the University of Bergen in Norway to conduct the study. They asked 40,401 Norwegian residents how often they engaged in both light and intense physical activity during their leisure time. Light activity was defined as an activity that did not lead to being sweaty or out-of-breath, while intense activity did result in sweating or breathlessness. The residents were also asked how physically active they were at work, underwent a physical examination and answered questions regarding symptoms of depression and anxiety.

The team found an inverse relationship between the amount of leisure-time activity and symptoms of depression. In other words, the more people engaged in physical activity during their spare time, the less likely they were to be depressed. People who were not active in their leisure time were almost twice as likely to have symptoms of depression compared to the most active individuals. Interestingly, the intensity of the exercise didn’t seem to make any difference. Even people who took light exercise, without breaking into a sweat or getting out-of-breath, were less likely to show symptoms of depression.

However, the researchers found no such relationship between workplace activity and symptoms of depression. Nor did they find any consistent relationship between physical activity and anxiety.

Lead researcher Dr Samuel Harvey said: “Our study shows that people who engage in regular leisure-time activity of any intensity are less likely to have symptoms of depression. We also found that the context in which activity takes place is vital and that the social benefits associated with exercise, like increased numbers of friends and social support, are more important in understanding how exercise may be linked to improved mental health than any biological markers of fitness. This may explain why leisure activity appears to have benefits not seen with physical activity undertaken as part of a working day.”

References:

Harvey SB, Hotopf M, Øverland S and Mykletun A (2010) Physical activity and common mental health, British Journal of Psychiatry, 197: 357-364
Source:
Royal College of Psychiatrists

A 2010 Harris Interactive survey reveals that many people, especially those who believe they are in fair or poor health, claim to lack the willpower and opportunity to make useful changes that would improve their lives.

Parents also appear to be unaware of the effect the stress they have to bear is having on their children. A growing number of young children are describing emotional and health consequences typically linked to stress.

Norman B. Anderson, PhD, American Psychological Association’s (APA’s) chief executive officer and executive vice president, said:

“America is at a critical crossroads when it comes to stress and our health. Year after year nearly three-quarters of Americans say they experience stress at levels that exceed what they define as healthy, putting themselves at risk for developing chronic illnesses such as heart disease, diabetes and depression.

Stress is hurting our physical and emotional health and contributing to some of the leading causes of death in this country. People are also saying they have difficulty implementing the changes they know will decrease their stress and improve their health. Yet, our health care system is not adequately addressing this issue or providing the behavioral health treatments that can help Americans. All of us, including the medical community, need to take stress seriously since stress could easily become our next public health crisis.”

The impact on children

Overweight or obese children were found to have significantly higher incidences of stress; most said their parents were always or often stressed four weeks prior to being surveyed. This link between overweight/obesity and stress also exists among adults.

31% of overweight/obese children worry a great deal or a lot, while 14% of children of normal body weight do the same. 36% of overweight/obese children worry about their looks, compared to 11% of normal-weight kids.

39% of overweight/obese children say their parents are stressed out often or always, compared to 30% of normal-weight kids.

The survey identified a clear link between overweight in children and physical/emotional health consequences linked to stress, and the unhealthy management of stress. When asked whether they had experienced any of the following during the previous twelve months, this is how they responded:

• Have you had trouble falling asleep?
  Overweight children 48%. Normal weight children 33%.
• Do you get headaches?
  Overweight children 43%. Normal weight children 28%.
• Have you been eating too much or too little?
  Overweight children 48%. Normal weight children 16%.
• Have you been feeling angry or getting into fights?
  Overweight children 22%. Normal weight children 13%.
• Do you eat to make yourself feel better when you are stressed or worried about something?
  Overweight children 27%. Normal weight children 14%.
• Do you take a nap to make yourself feel better when you are stressed or worried about something?
  Overweight children 26%. Normal weight children 15%.

The effect stress is having on families

When asked to rate their levels of stress from nothing (0) to maximum (10), 32% of parents rated theirs at 8 to 10, what the authors of the report describe as extreme levels of stress. The vast majority of parents say they are enduring levels of stress which go beyond their definition of healthy. The average stress score reported by all parents in the survey was 6.1. Those who described their stress levels as healthy scored an average of 3.9.

69% of respondents believe that managing stress is either very or extremely important. Unfortunately, and perhaps worryingly, only 32% feel they are doing either a very good or excellent job of managing their stress. The majority of the children of parents enduring very high levels of stress say there is a negative impact on the family.

Parental unawareness of the impact of stress on the family could have far-reaching consequences on each member’s emotional and physical short-term and long-term health. While 69% of stressed parents say the impact on their offspring is zero or very slight, only 14% of children say their parent’s stress does not upset or bother them. 34% of kids reveal that they know that when their parent(s) shout it is due to stress or worry.

17% of children who said that a parent is perpetually stressed reported having a lot of stress themselves, compared to 2% of children who said their parents are never stressed.

Below are some more highlighted figures revealed by the survey:

• 47% of tweens (aged 8 to 12) and 33% of teens report feeling sad
• 36% of tweens and 43% of teens claim to feel worried
• 25% of tweens and 38% of teens claim to feel frustrated when their parents are stressed
• 56% of parents find that getting their family members to eat healthily is an ordeal
• 54% of parents say they find getting their family to be physically active requires either some or a lot of effort
• 36% of tweens and 66% of teens listen to music when they are stressed
• 56% of tweens and 41% of teens play computer/video games when they are stressed
• 34% of tweens and 30% of teens watch television when they are stressed

Katherine C. Nordal, PhD, APA’s executive director for professional practice, said:

Even though children know when their parents are stressed and admit that it directly affects them, parents are grossly underestimating the impact that their stress is having on their children. It’s critical that parents communicate with their children about how to identify stress triggers and manage stress in healthy ways while they’re young and still developing behavioral patterns. If children don’t learn these lessons early on, it could significantly impact their physical health and emotional well-being down the road, especially as they become adults.

Full Report “Stress in America 2010″
Article Date: 09 Nov 2010 – 15:00 PST
From: Medical News Today

Is it something about the middle of the week? Job stresses piling up and potentially overwhelming people who already see their problems as insurmountable?

“It may be just that it feels like there’s no way out on Wednesday, (it’s) too long to wait for the weekend,” said Theodore Mucha, medical director at the Institute of Living at Hartford Hospital in Hartford, Conn. Like other experts, he cautioned that his explanation was just a guess.

Researchers Augustine J. Kposowa and Stephanie D’Auria at the University of California, Riverside, examined data from U.S. death records from 2000 to 2004, focusing on adult suicides. They found that 24.6 percent of suicides occurred on Wednesdays. The next-highest rates were 14.4 percent on Saturdays and 14.3 percent on Mondays. The fewest suicides occurred on Thursdays — 11.1 percent. Kposowa and D’Auria also found that more suicides occurred in summer and spring than in fall or winter, contrasting with traditional thinking that winter months bring more risk of suicide.

Other parts of the study were consistent with previous research, showing that men are more likely to take their lives than women, and people who are divorced, white, educated or living in nonmetropolitan areas have a higher risk of suicide. Kposowa pointed to workplace stress as a potential explanation and believes changes in Americans’ work and family life may be behind the shift in suicide’s concentration from Mondays to Wednesdays.

Increased economic competition worldwide has threatened job security for many workers, heightening stress, frustration and even feelings of betrayal, said Kposowa, a sociology professor. “Individuals work harder and harder, but seem to be losing ground; they have little or nothing to show for their labor — especially among those who depend on others for wages,” he wrote in an e-mail. “It is highly likely that the middle of the week (represented by Wednesday) is when these stressors and feelings of hopelessness are at their highest.”

Several mental health workers said they had not noticed a link between Wednesdays and an increased risk of suicide. More than 25,000 people kill themselves in the U.S. each year, an average of slightly more than one per day in each state, so trends that might be apparent from thousands of cases might not be noticed by individual mental health workers or programs.

The seasonal figures contradict previous findings, but they didn’t surprise Michael Levinson, director of clinical services at the Capitol Region Mental Health Center in Hartford. He works nights in an emergency room and has gotten used to seeing more psychiatric emergencies in the spring.

While traditional thinking has focused on winter, with its cold weather and lack of sunlight, as a more common season for suicide, Levinson has a theory about why it may not be so: People think it’s normal to be depressed in the winter. “Spring is the time of year when people are supposed to be rejuvenated and outside and enjoying themselves, and if you’re not, it makes you feel comparatively worse than everybody else, which may make you feel more hopeless,” he said.

Distributed by the Los Angeles Times-Washington Post News Service